Do you have the right SMS provider?
- espenstoraas

- 15 hours ago
- 3 min read

We talk a lot about new channels: RCS, WhatsApp, email, push, social media. Yet the reality is simple:
👉 SMS is – and will long be – the most important communication channel for businesses that want to reach end customers.
At the same time, we see that many businesses have had the same SMS provider for years , without making a real evaluation of whether the solution is still right. It's a risky sport.
SMS is much more than “message in – message out.” Below you will find some questions you should ask yourself regularly.
1. Security – is your data well secured?
How are personal data and traffic handled?
Do you have secure authentication and 2-factor login ?
Is access control and logging in place?
If your SMS channel is critical for operations, customer dialogue, or security, then security must be accordingly.
2. Customer support – do you get help when you need it?
Do you get quick, competent assistance when something happens?
Do you have a contact person or just a generic support center?
Do you feel that the supplier cares about your success?
When something goes wrong, the quality of customer support means everything.
3. Reporting and insights – do you see what is actually happening?
Do you have transparent access to delivery rates and error codes?
Can you easily analyze campaigns, mailings, and discrepancies?
Is the insight actively used in your improvement work?
Without insight, you're groping blindly – even if the messages seem to be getting out.
4. Scalability – can you grow with your current provider?
Does the current solution handle increased volume without problems?
Can you expand to new countries and destinations?
Is the provider actively working on new services (RCS, new APIs, better security)?
A good supplier should not be a limitation when it comes to your growth – but on the contrary, an enabler.
5. Ease of use – how cumbersome is it really?
Are interfaces and portals easy to use ?
Are the invoices structured and understandable?
Are the APIs modern, well-documented, and stable?
If your team has to "struggle" with the tools, you lose time and quality every single day.
6. Functionality – do you have what you actually need?
Should you be able to:
mask the content or parts of the content?
set storage time and lifetime of messages?
prevent unnecessarily long messages (which drastically increase costs)?
block shipping to expensive destinations?
ensure correct sender ID?
be able to integrate directly with Salesforce, Dynamics 365 or other core systems?
If the answer is yes to several of these – but your solution doesn't support it – you have a gap.

7. Does the supplier also work with your competitors?
What else does the supplier provide in the market?
Who owns the supplier?
Is there a risk that you are actually financing your own competitor , directly or indirectly?
It is worth having a conscious relationship with these questions.
8. Is the supplier honest and thinking long-term?
An important but often forgotten question:
Do you know how much the supplier earns from you?
Have they ever suggested that you should n't send text messages?
Have they recommended measures that actually reduce your volume but increase quality?
A partner who always says "send more," without discussing relevance, quality, or other channels, is perhaps most concerned with their own income.
Yes, price is important – but it's not everything
The price per SMS is visible and easy to compare. However:
If you push the price all the way down to the supplier's cost price , money has to be saved somewhere.
Often it means:
poorer customer support
slower development rate
less focus on safety and quality
weaker stability
A long-term, proper supplier must make money in order to:
develop new services
ensure uptime
invest in security
be there when you need them most
When should you reassess?
If you haven't evaluated your SMS provider in years
If no one really knows how the solution is actually set up
If SMS is critical, but is treated as "something simple and cheap in the background"
Then perhaps it is time to look up.


Comments